<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghostwriting documents now fully available on PLoS Medicine website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/</link>
	<description>PLoS Medicine community blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriting – from “The Inside”: Outrage Hinges on Unclear Definitions « Kate Johnson's Medical Musings</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostwriting – from “The Inside”: Outrage Hinges on Unclear Definitions « Kate Johnson's Medical Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-409</guid>
		<description>[...] an editorial after the story broke, entitled Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger, the PLoS editors wrote “attempting to hide the presence of ghostwriters or the involvement of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an editorial after the story broke, entitled Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger, the PLoS editors wrote “attempting to hide the presence of ghostwriters or the involvement of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unscientific America: Mooney &#38; Kirshenbaum reviewed in BMJ</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Unscientific America: Mooney &#38; Kirshenbaum reviewed in BMJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] (2) &#160; PLoS One. Ghostwriting documents now fully available on PLoS Medicine website. 21-8-2009 http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-med... (3) &#160; Colquhoun, D. Universities Inc. in the UK. The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (2) &nbsp; PLoS One. Ghostwriting documents now fully available on PLoS Medicine website. 21-8-2009 <a href="http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-med.." rel="nofollow">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-med..</a>. (3) &nbsp; Colquhoun, D. Universities Inc. in the UK. The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLoS on Medical Ghostwriting « Indentured Academitude</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>PLoS on Medical Ghostwriting « Indentured Academitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] editors of PLoS Medicine have contributed an editorial on ghostwriting, at the PLoS Medicine Blog and how crazy-awful it is. To quote a section of the article: In the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editors of PLoS Medicine have contributed an editorial on ghostwriting, at the PLoS Medicine Blog and how crazy-awful it is. To quote a section of the article: In the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And, In Other PLoS News… « Pasco Phronesis</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>And, In Other PLoS News… « Pasco Phronesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-214</guid>
		<description>[...] indexing the materials, so it will be a slog to dig through them at the moment.  You can read the forthcoming editorial from that journal, as well as the documents and related court materials, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] indexing the materials, so it will be a slog to dig through them at the moment.  You can read the forthcoming editorial from that journal, as well as the documents and related court materials, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study &#38; Money » Blog Archive » UD is, at bottom, sentimental.</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Study &#38; Money » Blog Archive » UD is, at bottom, sentimental.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-212</guid>
		<description>[...] pharma industry, that some lawsuits are indispensable) and thanks to the people behind this blog, PLoS Medicine, who got the documents released. Excerpts from their editorial announcing the publication of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pharma industry, that some lawsuits are indispensable) and thanks to the people behind this blog, PLoS Medicine, who got the documents released. Excerpts from their editorial announcing the publication of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Diaries » UD is, at bottom, sentimental.</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>University Diaries » UD is, at bottom, sentimental.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-211</guid>
		<description>[...] I guess. While editors, medical schools, and universities have turned a blind eye to, or at the least failed to tackle head-on the pervasive presence of ghostwriting, drug companies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I guess. While editors, medical schools, and universities have turned a blind eye to, or at the least failed to tackle head-on the pervasive presence of ghostwriting, drug companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn Tribole MS RD</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn Tribole MS RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Excellent expose and great example of the need for transparency and open access journals.

It seems that many scientific papers receive funding from food corporations, the source of which is often disclosed.  Have you considered investigating if the food industry uses ghost writers to sway health care policy and recommendations for healthful eating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent expose and great example of the need for transparency and open access journals.</p>
<p>It seems that many scientific papers receive funding from food corporations, the source of which is often disclosed.  Have you considered investigating if the food industry uses ghost writers to sway health care policy and recommendations for healthful eating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Ghostwriter, &#171; how not to win a war</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Ghostwriter, &#171; how not to win a war</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] now you&#8217;ve gone too far. There are some things a guy just can&#8217;t take. Now you&#8217;ve gone and slept around. If you are an editor, author, reviewer, or reader of medical journals, or if you depend on your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now you&#8217;ve gone too far. There are some things a guy just can&#8217;t take. Now you&#8217;ve gone and slept around. If you are an editor, author, reviewer, or reader of medical journals, or if you depend on your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriting Documents Available at PLoS Medicine &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2009/08/21/ghostwriting-documents-now-fully-available-on-plos-medicine-website/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostwriting Documents Available at PLoS Medicine &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/?p=632#comment-201</guid>
		<description>[...] scientific ghostwriting? Today PLoS Medicine posted an editorial from the September issue on their blog to coincide with the availability on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scientific ghostwriting? Today PLoS Medicine posted an editorial from the September issue on their blog to coincide with the availability on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
