Skip to content

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

PLOS BLOGS Speaking of Medicine and Health

Ebola: Ten Years Later – Lessons Learned and Future Pandemic Preparedness

By guest contributor Krutika Kuppalli, with thanks to Dr Inger Damon for her review

In early December 2013, a 2-year-old boy in the remote village of Meliandou, Guinea fell ill with a mysterious disease and succumbed to the illness a few days later.1 The disease spread rapidly, resulting in 49 cases and 29 deaths before being identified as the Zaire strain of the Ebola virus and officially declared an outbreak on March 23, 2014.2 Over the ensuing months, the outbreak spread to neighboring Liberia and Sierra Leone, with cases also emerging in Senegal, Nigeria, Mali, the United States and Europe.3 On August 8, 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the highest global health alert, signifying the outbreak posed a public health risk to other Member States and necessitated a coordinated international response.4 Despite global efforts to control the outbreak, it lasted for over two years, resulting in over 28,000 cases and more than 11,000 deaths by the time it was declared over on June 9, 2016.3 This crisis exposed significant weaknesses in global health systems, prompting a re-evaluation of pandemic preparedness and response strategies. A decade later, it is essential to reflect on the lessons learned from the West Africa Ebola crisis and their impact on current and future pandemic preparedness efforts. These lessons are outlined using the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (HEPR) architecture developed by WHO, focusing on strengthening five core health emergency components: collaborative surveillance, safe and scalable care, community protection, access to countermeasures, and emergency coordination.5

Collaborative Surveillance

Early detection and rapid response are critical in controlling outbreaks. During the Ebola epidemic, delays in recognizing initial cases in Guinea allowed the virus to spread unchecked.1 The first case occurred in December 2013, but due to delays in recognition – largely because Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) had not been previously detected in this region – cases were not confirmed until late March 2014.1 By then, the outbreak had spread for over three months and was already out of control. Advances in diagnostic and surveillance systems, such as genomic sequencing and the use of technology for real-time data collection and analysis, have significantly improved our ability to detect and respond to outbreaks swiftly. This progress has led to more robust surveillance systems and quicker mobilization of resources and personnel during new outbreaks. The formation of rapid response teams that can be quickly deployed, along with the development of clear protocols—particularly for contact identification, education, and follow-up—are essential components of this strategy.

 Map to show how doctors communicated between the red and green zones to know what beds were available. Image credit: Krutika Kuppalli

Safe and Scalable Care

The Ebola outbreak highlighted the urgent need for robust health systems and optimized patient management. In the most affected countries, overwhelmed healthcare systems struggled to provide adequate care due to shortages of trained staff, medical supplies, testing infrastructure, logistical support, and financial resources.6 These deficiencies hampered patient identification and treatment, facilitating the virus’s spread.

An indirect impact of EVD outbreak was a significant setback in treating malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis, resulting in an estimated 10,600 deaths in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.7 The influx of Ebola patients reduced essential health services like vaccinations, maternity care, and routine healthcare, leading to higher mortality rates.8 The outbreak underscored the necessity for specialized training and support for healthcare workers handling infectious diseases and high-risk patients. Strict infection control practices, such as proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), isolation protocols, and hygiene practices, were crucial in preventing nosocomial infections.

In response, international efforts focused on strengthening health systems, particularly in vulnerable regions. This included improving healthcare facilities with triage protocols, training in infection prevention and control (IPC), ensuring essential medical supplies like PPE were available, and enhancing diagnostic capabilities. The crisis spurred innovations in clinical care, such as optimized supportive care, rapid diagnostic tests, and experimental treatments and vaccines.9 These measures have had lasting impacts on infectious disease management and improved preparedness for future pandemics. A strong health system is the first line of defense against any infectious disease outbreak.

Ebola treatment center. Image credit: Krutika Kuppalli

Community Protection

Challenges with community engagement hindered effective public health interventions during the 2014 Ebola outbreak.10 Mistrust of health authorities and international aid workers, stemming from a history of neglect and the sudden influx of foreign medical personnel, exacerbated resistance to medical interventions. 10 Traditional cultural beliefs and practices, such as burial rituals involving washing and touching the deceased, facilitated the virus’s spread and were difficult to change due to their deep cultural significance.11 Communication barriers, including language differences and low literacy levels, hampered the dissemination of public health messages, which were often misunderstood or failed to reach the intended audience.12 Stigma associated with Ebola led to social isolation of patients and their families, deterring individuals from seeking medical help.11 Instances of violence and hostility towards health workers, fueled by fear and misinformation, made it dangerous to operate in certain areas. Political and socioeconomic factors, such as weak governance, lack of infrastructure, and economic hardship, further strained the relationship between communities and health authorities. Effective communication strategies, culturally sensitive health education, and involving community leaders were essential in overcoming these challenges.

Consequently, future responses for Ebola and other pathogens have prioritized these approaches to enhance the uptake of public health measures. Building trust and fostering community cooperation have proven to be indispensable in managing health crises. Addressing these challenges in future outbreaks requires early and continuous engagement, developing culturally appropriate communication strategies, addressing stigma, and strengthening health systems and infrastructure to ensure a robust and effective response.

Ambulance carrying a patient to the ETU from a rural village. Image credit: Krutika Kuppalli

Access to Countermeasures

The Ebola outbreak accelerated research and development through regulatory review of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostic tools. The successful development and deployment of therapeutics such as ZMapp along with the chimpanzee adenovirus 3 vaccine (ChAd3-EBO-Z) and the recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus vaccine (rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP) Ebola vaccine in the middle of a health crises were major milestones and have been used in subsequent outbreaks.13,14 Likewise, the development and use of rapid and point-of-care tests were crucial for quickly diagnosing and isolating infected individuals, thereby containing the virus’s spread and facilitating timely treatment.15 This experience has informed current pandemic preparedness by highlighting the necessity of global collaboration in research and development, swift regulatory processes and the establishment of robust clinical trials frameworks. Continued investment in research and development is crucial to stay ahead of emerging infectious diseases. Public-private partnerships play a significant role in ensuring that medical countermeasures are developed, tested, and made available to all quickly and in an equitable manner.

Handwashing station at the entrance to the ETU. Image credit: Krutika Kuppalli

Coordination

The Ebola crisis underscored the necessity of international collaboration and coordination. The global response involved multiple organizations, including the national Ministries of Health and governments of Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, scientists, researchers, clinicians, public health officials and numerous government and non-governmental agencies. However, the response was initially fragmented. Streamlining coordination, sharing resources, and ensuring efficient logistics are imperative for a unified and effective response. The establishment of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in the aftermath of the outbreak were important steps towards better coordination of international health efforts for future emergency events.

The Ebola outbreak of 2014-2016 was a wake-up call for the global community, highlighting the vulnerabilities in our health systems and the necessity for comprehensive preparedness strategies. Ten years later, the lessons learned have led to significant advancements in collaborative surveillance, safe and scalable care, community protection, access to countermeasures and global coordination. The recent COVID-19 pandemic and global mpox outbreaks serve as stark reminders that preparedness is an ongoing process that requires sustained effort, investment, and global cooperation. As we move forward, building on the lessons from the 2014 West Africa Ebola outbreak and our more recent health emergencies will be essential in safeguarding against future health threats and ensuring a resilient global health system.

Supplies given to Ebola survivors. Image credit: Krutika Kuppalli

About the author:

Krutika Kuppalli, MD, FIDSA is an Infectious Diseases physician focused on emerging pathogens, global health, and outbreak response. She completed her Internal Medicine residency and Infectious Diseases fellowship at Emory University, a Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego and was an Emerging Leader in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in 2021.

Dr. Kuppalli was previously awarded the NIH Fogarty International Clinical Research Fellowship and conducted research in Southern India to understand barriers to care and how emerging infections impacted the disease course in persons living with HIV/AIDS.  She was the medical director of a large Ebola Treatment Unit in Sierra Leone during the 2014 West Africa Ebola outbreak, has helped lead the development and implementation of pandemic response preparedness activities in resource limited settings, and has consulted on the development of therapeutics for emerging pathogens. Her clinical and research interests focus on health systems strengthening in resource limited settings, research and clinical care for emerging infections, outbreak preparedness and response, and policy. She has worked in numerous countries including Ethiopia, India, Sierra Leone, Uganda, and Haiti.

During the COVID-19 pandemic Dr. Kuppalli served as a consultant for the San Francisco Department of Health and helped plan and operationalize a field hospital. She served as an expert witness to the U.S. Congress, Financial Services Committee Task Force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) about how digital technologies may be leveraged for exposure notification and contact tracing to improve the pandemic response. She also collaborated with the Brennan Center for Justice to develop guidelines to inform “Healthy in-person Voting” in advance of the 2020 U.S. election and testified before the U.S. House Select Subcommittee regarding these recommendations.  Prior to her position at WHO, she was the medical lead for COVID-19 vaccine rollout at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and helped coordinate vaccine education events to help engage and educate staff and patients, particularly those in underserved locations to increase vaccine uptake.

In August 2021, Dr. Kuppalli joined WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland as a medical officer for the COVID-19 pandemic response where she was an integral part of the global incident management team. Her responsibilities included serving as a member of the secretariat for the Scientific Advisory Group on the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), contributing to the clinical characterization and management working group for COVID-19, participating in the COVID-19 therapeutics steering committee, and serving as the technical focal point for the post COVID-19 condition (Long COVID) steering committee. Additionally, she was actively involved as a member of the Ebola Virus Disease therapeutics steering committee.

Dr Kuppalli has also been a core member of the global WHO incident management team since the beginning of the multi-country mpox outbreak in May 2022 until April 2024. In this capacity, she collaborated on the development of various technical documents, including normative guidance materials as well as helped develop and launch the global mpox partnership which aims to identify knowledge gaps and foster collaborations among stakeholders. She has provided support for proceedings with the IHR Emergency Committee and participated in two high-level missions to Nigeria and the Central African Republic.

Dr. Kuppalli is recognized as a scientific expert in emerging pathogens, global health, biosecurity and outbreak response. She has advised governments at the local, national, and global level and held several leadership roles. She is the past chair of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s (IDSA) Global Health Committee and served as part of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) Trainee Committee. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Kuppalli was recognized by NPR Source of The Week as an expert to follow and named to Elemental’s 50 Experts to Trust in a Pandemic. She has been a frequent contributor to numerous domestic and international media outlets including the New York Times, NPR, Reuters, Washington Post, Vox, Stat News, The San Francisco Chronicle, Forbes, NBC Bay Area, BBC News.

References

1       World Health Organization. Ground zero in Guinea: the Ebola outbreak smoulders – undetected – for more than 3 months. 2015; published online Sept 4. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-09-2015-ground-zero-in-guinea-the-ebola-outbreak-smoulders-undetected-for-more-than-3-months (accessed Aug 4, 2024).

2       World Health Organization. Origins of the Ebola epidemic. 2015; published online Jan. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/one-year-into-the-ebola-epidemic/origins-of-the-2014-ebola-epidemic (accessed Aug 4, 2024).

3       CDC. Outbreak History. Ebola. 2024; published online June 25. https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/outbreaks/index.html (accessed Aug 4, 2024).

4       World Health Organization. Statement on the 1st meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee on the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. 2014; published online Aug 8. https://www.who.int/news/item/08-08-2014-statement-on-the-1st-meeting-of-the-ihr-emergency-committee-on-the-2014-ebola-outbreak-in-west-africa (accessed Aug 4, 2024).

5       World Health Organization. Defining collaborative surveillance: a core concept for strengthening the global architecture for health emergency preparedness, response, and resilience (HEPR). World Health Organization, 2023 https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=FaMOEQAAQBAJ.

6       Gostin LO, Friedman EA. A retrospective and prospective analysis of the west African Ebola virus disease epidemic: robust national health systems at the foundation and an empowered WHO at the apex. Lancet 2015; 385: 1902–9.

7       Parpia AS, Ndeffo-Mbah ML, Wenzel NS, Galvani AP. Effects of Response to 2014-2015 Ebola Outbreak on Deaths from Malaria, HIV/AIDS, and Tuberculosis, West Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 22: 433–41.

8       Mæstad O, Shumbullo EL. Ebola outbreak 2014-2016: Effects on other health services. CMI Brief 2020; published online April 1. https://www.cmi.no/publications/7212-ebola-outbreak-2014-2016-effects-on-other-health-services.

9       World Health Organization. Optimized supportive care for Ebola virus disease. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325000/9789241515894-eng.pdf (accessed June 2, 2022).

10    Wilkinson A, Parker M, Martineau F, Leach M. Engaging ‘communities’: anthropological insights from the West African Ebola epidemic. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 372: 20160305.

11    World Health Organization. Factors that contributed to undetected spread. 2015; published online Jan. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/one-year-into-the-ebola-epidemic/factors-that-contributed-to-undetected-spread-of-the-ebola-virus-and-impeded-rapid-containment (accessed Aug 4, 2024).

12    Bastide L. Crisis Communication During the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: The Paradoxes of Decontextualized Contextualization. In: Bourrier M, Bieder C, eds. Risk Communication for the Future: Towards Smart Risk Governance and Safety Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 95–108.

13    The PREVAIL II Writing Group, for the Multi-National PREVAIL II Study Team. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of ZMapp for Ebola Virus Infection. N Engl J Med; 375: 1448–56.

14    Kennedy Stephen B., Bolay Fatorma, Kieh Mark, et al. Phase 2 Placebo-Controlled Trial of Two Vaccines to Prevent Ebola in Liberia. N Engl J Med; 377: 1438–47.

15    Chua AC, Cunningham J, Moussy F, Perkins MD, Formenty P. The Case for Improved Diagnostic Tools to Control Ebola Virus Disease in West Africa and How to Get There. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9: e0003734.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by contributors are solely those of individual contributors, and not necessarily those of PLOS.

Related Posts
Back to top